RiseA public record of protest in India
Find a protestSubscribe
← All protest records
EndedChhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh forest department withdraws order on Community Forest Resource Rights after tribal protests

The Chhattisgarh forest department withdrew a directive concerning Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR), according to a forest department statement reported by National Herald. The Wire reported that statewide protests across at least eight districts on July 1, 2 and 3 preceded the withdrawal. The withdrawn order had named the forest department, rather than the Department of Tribal Welfare, as the 'nodal authority' for implementing the Forest Rights Act, according to The Wire's reporting of the order's text.

Latest material update

Why people rose

According to The Wire's reporting, the forest department's order made itself, rather than the Department of Tribal Welfare, the nodal authority for implementing the Forest Rights Act — a change communities and activists saw as at odds with the law. Down To Earth's analysis states that under the Forest Rights Act (2006), Gram Sabhas hold supreme authority over Community Forest Resource governance and forest departments are meant to facilitate rather than regulate it. Scroll.in reporting says a forest department letter raised suspicion among forest communities that the department sought to reassert control over forest management, and cites a 2020 episode near Achanakmar Tiger Reserve when district authorities asked communities to obtain a no-objection certificate from the forest department before exercising CFR rights — something activists said contradicted the Act.

In their own terms

What people are asking for

  1. 01

    Withdrawal of the forest department's directive/circular on Community Forest Resource Rights, as sought by protesting communities

  2. 02

    Recognition of Gram Sabhas' authority over Community Forest Resource governance, per Down To Earth's analysis of the Forest Rights Act

  3. 03

    Restoration of the Department of Tribal Welfare, rather than the forest department, as nodal authority for implementing the Forest Rights Act, per The Wire's reporting

The people

Who is carrying the demand

Tribal communities and forest rights groups across Chhattisgarh took part in the protests, according to the available reporting. Specific individuals, villages, or organizations are not named in the material reviewed.

What changed

The Chhattisgarh forest department withdrew its CFRR directive. A forest department statement, as reported by National Herald, says forest minister Kedar Kashyap directed that the advisory be withdrawn. The order's core provision — naming the forest department as nodal authority for the Forest Rights Act instead of the Department of Tribal Welfare — has been rescinded, per The Wire's reporting.

The public record, claim by claim

What was said, and who said it

  1. Reported as fact
    Tribal communities and forest rights groups staged protests in Chhattisgarh against a forest department order concerning Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR).
  2. Reported as factBacked by an official record
    The Chhattisgarh forest department withdrew its directive/order on Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR) following the protests.
  3. An accountBacked by an official record
    Forest minister Kedar Kashyap directed that the CFRR advisory be withdrawn, according to a forest department statement.

    Attributed to Chhattisgarh forest department statement, as reported by National Herald

  4. An account
    Statewide protests occurred across at least eight districts of Chhattisgarh on July 1, 2 and 3, forcing the forest department to withdraw the order.

    Attributed to The Wire reporting

  5. An accountBacked by an official record
    The withdrawn order had designated the forest department, rather than the Department of Tribal Welfare, as the 'nodal authority' for implementing the Forest Rights Act.

    Attributed to The Wire reporting, citing the order's text

  6. An interpretation
    Under the Forest Rights Act (2006), Gram Sabhas hold supreme authority over Community Forest Resource (CFR) governance, and forest departments are meant to facilitate rather than regulate this governance.

    Attributed to Down To Earth analysis

  7. An account
    In 2020, district authorities asked forest communities near Chhattisgarh's Achanakmar Tiger Reserve to obtain a no-objection certificate from the forest department before exercising their Community Forest Resource rights, which activists said contradicted the Forest Rights Act.

    Attributed to Activists, as reported by Scroll.in

  8. An interpretation
    A letter from the Chhattisgarh forest department raised suspicion among forest communities that the department sought to reassert control over forest management, contributing to the protests.

    Attributed to Scroll.in reporting

What is not settled

What we still do not know

The exact districts and locations of the protests beyond The Wire's reference to 'at least eight districts' are not established in the material reviewed. The scale of participation, the names of organizing groups, and whether any further departmental order or clarification has since been issued are not known from the sources available.

Read the sources yourself

Where this record came from

Rise stores links, necessary excerpts and source relationships, not mirrored articles or social posts.

  1. National HeraldIndependent Reporter · en

    “Amid protests, Chhattisgarh govt withdraws directive on Community Forest Resource Rights Under the Forest Rights Act, CFRR empowers gram sabhas to manage and protect community forest resources Faced with mounting protests, the Chhattisgarh forest department on Thursday withdrew its directive that had effectively barred all other government departments, NGOs and private entities from undertaking any activity concerning Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR). Forest minister Kedar Kashyap has directed that the advisory be withdrawn, the department said in a statement. The directive was perceive”

    Open source ↗
  2. Down To EarthIndependent Reporter · en

    “Gram Sabhas hold supreme authority under FRA — forest departments must facilitate, not regulate, CFR governance Gram Sabha Authority: Under FRA, Gram Sabhas hold supreme authority in CFR governance, challenging Chhattisgarh forest department's regulatory overreach. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act (FRA) of 2006 marks a pivotal legislative achievement in India, designed to redress historical injustices faced by forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers. It recognises their inherent rights to ancestral fore”

    Open source ↗
  3. Scroll.inIndependent Reporter · en

    “Why a letter by Chhattisgarh’s forest department ignited protests Communities fought hard for the right to manage and conserve forests. A letter raised suspicion that the forest department wanted to take back control. In 2020, when forest communities living near Chhattisgarh’s Achanakmar Tiger Reserve laid claim to their legal right to conserve and manage the forest, they faced an unexpected roadblock. The district authorities asked them to get a no-objection certificate from the forest department. Activists pointed out that this defied logic – the Forest Rights Act, 2006, under which the comm”

    Open source ↗
  4. The WireIndependent Reporter · en

    “Protests Force Chhattisgarh Forest Dept to Withdraw ‘Typo-Ridden’ Order On Community Forest Rights - The Wire As per the order, the forest department would be the “nodal authority” for implementing the FRA, not the Department of Tribal Welfare. Non-profit. Reader-funded. Independent. Bengaluru: Statewide protests across at least eight districts on July 1, 2 and 3 forced the Chhattisgarh forest department to withdraw an order regarding the implementation of the community forest rights of tribal and other forest dwellers after it claimed that the forest department would be the “nodal authority””

    Open source ↗
  5. Google News regional discovery — ChhattisgarhOther · English

    “Chhattisgarh forest department withdraws circular on CFR rights after massive tribal protests The New Indian Express”

    Open source ↗
  6. Google News community discovery — Adivasi, indigenous and forest-rights dissentOther · English

    “Chhattisgarh forest department withdraws circular on CFR rights after massive tribal protests The New Indian Express”

    Open source ↗
  7. The WireIndependent Reporter · en

    “Protests Force Chhattisgarh Forest Dept to Withdraw ‘Typo-Ridden’ Order On Community Forest Rights - The Wire As per the order, the forest department would be the “nodal authority” for implementing the FRA, not the Department of Tribal Welfare. Non-profit. Reader-funded. Independent. Bengaluru: Statewide protests across at least eight districts on July 1, 2 and 3 forced the Chhattisgarh forest department to withdraw an order regarding the implementation of the community forest rights of tribal and other forest dwellers after it claimed that the forest department would be the “nodal authority””

    Open source ↗
  8. National HeraldIndependent Reporter · en

    “Amid protests, Chhattisgarh govt withdraws directive on Community Forest Resource Rights Under the Forest Rights Act, CFRR empowers gram sabhas to manage and protect community forest resources Faced with mounting protests, the Chhattisgarh forest department on Thursday withdrew its directive that had effectively barred all other government departments, NGOs and private entities from undertaking any activity concerning Community Forest Resource Rights (CFRR). Forest minister Kedar Kashyap has directed that the advisory be withdrawn, the department said in a statement. The directive was perceive”

    Open source ↗

About this revision

Revision 2 of this public record.

Added a later supported development.

Published on . A material update or correction creates a new immutable revision; this version cannot be silently rewritten.